What does Rule 404(b) prohibit, and what are permissible non-propensity purposes for other acts?

Enhance your knowledge of Mock Trial Rules of Evidence. Our study quiz includes multiple choice questions, detailed explanations, and insights to prepare you thoroughly for your next mock trial competition!

Multiple Choice

What does Rule 404(b) prohibit, and what are permissible non-propensity purposes for other acts?

Explanation:
Rule 404(b) bars using evidence of other crimes or acts to prove a person’s character in order to show they acted in conformity on the charged occasion. But it allows such evidence when it’s offered for non-propensity purposes—reasons other than showing character or propensity. The permitted non-propensity purposes include motive, intent, knowledge, opportunity, plan, identity, or absence of mistake. Each of these shows something about why or how the conduct happened, not that the person is the kind of person who commits crimes. For example, proving a motive explains why the defendant would commit the act; proving identity helps link the defendant to the act; proving absence of mistake suggests the act wasn’t accidental. Rule 403 may still require balancing to keep the evidence from being unduly prejudicial. So the best answer is the list of permissible non-propensity purposes: motive, intent, knowledge, opportunity, plan, identity, or absence of mistake.

Rule 404(b) bars using evidence of other crimes or acts to prove a person’s character in order to show they acted in conformity on the charged occasion. But it allows such evidence when it’s offered for non-propensity purposes—reasons other than showing character or propensity. The permitted non-propensity purposes include motive, intent, knowledge, opportunity, plan, identity, or absence of mistake. Each of these shows something about why or how the conduct happened, not that the person is the kind of person who commits crimes. For example, proving a motive explains why the defendant would commit the act; proving identity helps link the defendant to the act; proving absence of mistake suggests the act wasn’t accidental. Rule 403 may still require balancing to keep the evidence from being unduly prejudicial. So the best answer is the list of permissible non-propensity purposes: motive, intent, knowledge, opportunity, plan, identity, or absence of mistake.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy